Fallen Watchers part five
"And
the Lord sent
FIERY
SERPENTS
among
the people, and they bit
the
people; and
much
people of Israel died".
(Numbers
21:6)
The
translation for the word "fiery"
here is
[Strong's
ref. 8314 saraph]
or properly
annotated "seraphim" (plural). These are ANGELIC
BEINGS, and
they are DEMONIC!
The word for
serpent
here is "nachash"
in Hebrew (snake),
but it comes from the root [Strong's
ref. 5172 nachash,
naw - khash; a
prim. root; to hiss, i.e. whisper a magic
spell,
divine, enchanter, enchantment, diligently
observe].
Notice the allusions to sorcery, magic, and "EYES"
(observe). The
adjective "fiery" also infers "light" in its
translation. Now, I'm sorry, but these "serpents" were NOT
"poisonous
copper colored snakes" no matter how you cut it after you've
read the correct translation. The translation specifically says they
are SERAPHIM!
The translation for
these two words are identical to Isa.14:29, the only thing missing
here is the adjective "flying". There is confirmation of
this, but it has been overlooked and mis-interpreted.
This verse is
usually interpreted to mean the angel
of death that
killed the first born of the Egyptians. It is NOT
referring to the
"destroyer"
(singular) at all.
There was ONE
angel (the
Destroyer) that slew the first born of the Egyptians. This is not
referring to the Egyptians at all, it is talking about the Israelites
and the plagues
they endured in the wilderness during the "wandering". The
verse says ANGELS
(plural) that were
"among them". This is talking about the "fiery
serpents" (seraphim),
for there is NO
other
interpretation. Now, the Lord tells Moses to do something strange
here:
"And
the Lord said unto Moses, make thee a
FIERY
SERPENT,
and
put it upon a pole,
and
it shall come to pass, that every
one
that is bitten,when
he
L
O O K E T H
upon
it, shall live".
(vs.
9)
It
is a slightly different translation used here for
"fiery
serpents". The
translation for "serpents"
here is [Strong's
ref. 8314 saraph]
or "seraph"
(angelic being). Obviously, Moses did not make one of these, he made
an IMAGE
of one out of
brass. It is very interesting to note, that in the translation is
also the allusion to "seeing" or "observing".
Isn't it strange that by "looking" at this image
of a "fiery
seraph", the Israelites would be restored?
There is a profound
symbolic purpose for this which has never been properly interpreted
to satisfaction as far as I'm concerned. I believe I know a little of
the answer to this riddle, but some things need to be found out for
ones self for them to become "rama". Now, almost to a man,
every single pastor or teacher of the Word of God will deny what I
have just shown you pertaining to the "fiery serpents" in
the wilderness, of which the Israelites were plagued. God himself
will confirm what I've shown you through his servant David in the
book of Psalms:
"He
cast upon them the fierceness of his anger,
wrath,
indignation, and trouble, by SENDING
E
V I L A N G E L S
among
them".
(Psalm
78:49)
They
will still deny it, for they refuse to believe. This chapter in
Psalms is dealing with the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt. It
deals extensively with the plagues God brought upon the HEBREWS,
not the Egyptians. Make no mistake, the "fiery
serpents" were
"evil
angels",
not SNAKES!.
A great deal of
what is written in the bible about the "demonic host of heaven",
is placed "parable-like" throughout scripture. Like a giant
jigsaw puzzle, the pieces must be carefully extracted and
scrutinized, then organized for it to become coherent.
Of course, you
must BELIEVE and TRUST what
you are reading. This ultimately becomes a waste of time, if the
person is unwilling to believe in what is written! This person
usually formulates an interpretation that he/she WILL
believe .This
interpretation usually "blinds" the individual from seeing
the little "connecters" of the jigsaw puzzle. The puzzle in
the long run, is the "big picture". You will NOT
be able to see the
big picture without the "connecters" ( i.e. eyes, serpents,
locusts, nephillim, rapha etc.), and you can't see or interpret the
"connectors" if you don't believe in what the words mean
and their interpretation. I hate to use the phrase but its "all
academic".
The early church fathers and historians give almost nothing
as to this incident in the wilderness with the 'flying serpents', or
as Psalm 78 says, the "evil
angels".
Philo gives a philosophical diction on the meaning of the "brazen
serpent" lifted up by Moses to heal the people from the
serpents, but says virtually nothing about the 'serpents' themselves.
Josephus on the other hand, mentions nothing on this specific event
during the Exodus in his works at all. But, we can peruse a couple of
very interesting facts if we pay attention, and they will tell us
something of extreme importance. Philo and Josephus say only this
about the 'serpents':
"For
all around were rugged and precipitous rocks, or else a salt and
brackish plain,
and
stony mountains, or deep sands reaching up and forming mountains of
inacessable
height;
and moreover there was no river, neither winter torrent nor
ever-flowing
stream;
there were no springs, no plant growing from seed, NO
TREE whether
for fruit or timber,
NO
ANIMAL WHETHER FLYING OR TERRESTRIAL,
except
some few poisonous
R
E P T I L E S
BORN
FOR THE DESTRUCTION OF MANKIND,
and
SERPENTS,
and scorpians...."
(Philo,
"On
The Life Of Moses 1",
XXXV:192)
"For
when the ground was dificult to be passed over, because of the
multitude of
S
E R P E N T S
(which
it produces in vast numbers, and indeed is SINGULAR
in
some of those productions,
which
other countries DO
NOT BREED,
and yet such are worse than others in POWER
and
mischief, and an
UNUSUAL
FIERCENESS OF SIGHT,
some
of which
ASCEND
OUT OF THE GROUND UNSEEN,
and
also
F
L Y I N T H E A I R,
and
do come upon men at unawares, and do them mischief)......"
(Josephus,
"Antiquities Of The Jews", 2.10.245)
Now,
Philo only has this to say about the "serpents"
or rather "evil
angels",
but he says something of extreme importance. He says they were
"REPTILES"
created for the
destruction of man, and designates "serpents" or rather
'snakes' as something different. He also gives a description of the
wilderness which disproves that these "serpents" were
garden variety snakes that FLY,
of which there are today in areas of Asia (they can 'leap' from tree
to tree). Why? because Philo says there were no "TREES"
or anything else
but a barren plain of wilderness. He also states something that seems
contradictory at first glance and states that there were no
"animals", whether FLYING
or....TERRESTRIAL!!!
Now, this is a strange statement for it eliminates everything,
birds, animals, whether earth bound or 'terrestrial',
meaning in the FIRST
HEAVEN (earths
atmosphere). So what is Philo saying these reptiles are? It would
seem that Philo does NOT
know himself and
that these statements are from records not in the bible for
sure. He states that these 'reptiles'
were born for the
destruction of mankind, meaning they were implemented specifically
for the 'evil
angel assault' of
Exodus, and not common snakes or serpents of the ground.
If this isn't
strange enough, then we have to contend with Josephus's account. Now,
as I said, Josephus does not state anything about this 'serpents
in the wilderness' account
of the Exodus in his works. This statement is from an account about
Moses, before he was ordained by the Lord, while in service to
Pharoah in Egypt. It is an account of how Moses made war with the
Ethiopians while in service to Pharoah. This is much stranger for
Josephus states that these serpents were "singular"
meaning exclusive
to the country, just like Philo. There were not other 'breeds"
of these
'serpents".
He says they are much "worse" than other 'serpents', and
they are "UNUSUAL"
in appearence.
Furthermore, they came out of the "dens" in the ground
UNSEEN,
were extremly fierce, and......FLEW
IN THE AIR!!!.
Hes talking about "flying
serpents" here
folks and alludes to SUPERNATURAL
PROPERTIES which
they have (unseen, they fly, unusual appearence etc.). He states as
he goes on that these 'flying
serpents' attacked
the Egyptian army as they moved south through the wilderness towards
Ethiopia, and were "exclusive"
to that country.
Josephus, like Philo, is basing his statements on other accounts of
this event, not from the bible. Iraneus loosely explains this account
in his "fragments".
Josephus goes on to explain how Moses designed a way to deal with
these "flying
serpents",
by utilizing another mysterious creature, a type of "bird"
called an "IBE",
which josephus states is the greatest enemy of these "flying
serpents", and
which would hunt and destroy them when they attacked. Weird stuff
folks, and not to be ignored.
"About
the Time of the End,
a body of men will
be
raised up who will turn their attention to the
prophecies,
and insist upon their
literal
interpretation,
in
the midst of much clamor and opposition".
- Sir
Isaac Newton (1642 - 1727)
I believe this to
be a very profound statement coming from a man who was a Grand
Master of the Rosicrucians, Freemason,
Occultist, and thereby Luciferean,
amongst other
things. Oh!, you didn't know that? Do your research! He is also most
famous for giving us one of the most fundamental "laws"
(sic) of modern physics, "gravity".
That the "law of gravity" is a LIE!,
and easily proven
so. GRAVITY
DOES NOT EXIST by
its own definition.
Take a good look at the principles and laws of "gravity",
and then give me one good example of "pull"(and
before you come back to me, you better take another look at
"magnetism" and "inertia" while your at it). To
"pull'
something
is an ILLUSION.
In fact, your hands or whatever are "pushing" it. "Energy"
can NOT
move in two
directions, "from" and "upon"
itself SIMULTANEOUSLY
from the same point
source, and that is exactly what Newton's "law of gravity"
states!. ENERGY
CANNOT AND DOES NOT WORK THIS WAY!
It can not "go
out" and "come back" at the same time SIMULTANEOUSLY!,
and NO,
that's not how a magnet works!. But that's what "gravity"
states. The "force" of gravitation is a
"push",
NOT
a "pull".
Any ways, if you don't believe me, than maybe you'll believe Sir
Isaac himself who stated before he died that his "law" was
in fact FALSE
(pick up any copy
of an A.M.O.R.C.
Rosicrucian manual, and look up "gravity" in the Appendix,
p. 167). The "law of gravity" is diametrically the opposite
in principle to the "laws" that God created to govern the
universe. The bible says God "spoke, and the worlds WERE".
The WORD
went
OUT,
and all things WERE!
Besides, how come
NASA
must change their
mathematical formulas for measuring "gravity", 600 miles
outside of the earth's orbit? And something else, the word
"gravity"
is in your bible.
It is Greek and it means [Strong's
ref. 4587 semnotes,
sem
- not - ace;
venerableness:- gravity],
but it comes from this root, and check this out now [Strong's
ref. 4576 sebomai,
seb
- om - ahee;
a primary verb; to
revere,
i.e. adore:- devout, religious,
worship].
The real
meaning behind the word "gravity" is RELIGIOUS
WORSHIP!.
In fact, Sir
Isaac Newton,who
was a LUCIFEREAN,took
the word for his theorem, from the bible. It smells of Satan all over
it! Any ways, we have now gone down a "rabbit trail", and
we have to get back on course. Lets look at something you've ALWAYS
overlooked. Here is
another prime example of where the truth can be completely
over-looked. This one is so obvious you wonder why people still
follow the FALSE
SHEPHERDS OF BABYLON and
their doctrines, but of course if your not paying attention...
MIRY
CLAY
The
book of Daniel is probably the most mis-interpreted books of all the
bible. Exceedingly rich in prophecy, it contains some of the most
provocative verses of scripture. There is ONE
verse of scripture
that until recently, has NEVER
been
properly interpreted. We've all read this verse a thousand times
probably and never noticed the strange intent as to the meaning,
because we never paid attention!
"And
whereas thou sawest iron mixed with
miry
clay;
T
H E Y
shall
mingle
themselves
with the
SEED
OF MEN:
but
they shall
N
O T
cleave
one to another,
even
as iron is not mixed with clay".
(Daniel
2:43)
If you have any
knowledge of the New
World Order and
basic end-time biblical prophecy interpretation, than you will grasp
the frightening scenario here. This is the interpretation of the 4th
kingdom or the last-days kingdom according to Daniel. Its the one
being built before our very eyes right NOW! (NWO). The "toes"
of the kingdom are partly strong and partly broken according to
Nebuchadnezzars dream of the statue of a man (ten nations or states,
ten "kings", and ten "horns"). He relates the
"toes" as being mixed with "miry clay". What is
the the "miry
clay"?.
Look after the first comma of the verse, THEY
SHALL MINGLE THEMSELVES WITH THE SEED OF MEN!
The ONLY
textual conclusion
you can make is that the"THEY",
is something OTHER
THAN MEN or
HUMANS!
The "miry
clay" is NEPHILLIM!
(aliens?,
we'll see later).
Thats right, there is NO
other explanation
or alternative here according to the text. Are you SEEING
this? We
have to look deeper at this. The end of the verse is extremely
interesting. it states "they shall not cleave to one another".
Is the word cleave being used in the same context as "mingle? If
so, the probable answer as to why they won't cleave to one another,
is because they can't!.
Their ALL
MALES and
need the "seed of men" (woman) if being used in the context
of mingle. But if not, than the only other probable reason is because
THEY
don't want to give
themselves away! (reveal themselves). Read Dan.11:39...he shall cause
THEM
to rule over
many... and its all done by CRAFT!
This is why they
don't "cleave" to one another. When you consider that God
refers us "humans" as "clay", and to be molded by
his hand's, we see a strange parallel. Clay is mixed with water, or
the HOLY
SPIRIT in
the Lord's analogy of the "potters wheel". The meaning of
the term "miry clay" becomes quite interesting.
The root
for the word miry
here
is[Strong's
ref. 2916tiyt,
teet; from an unused root; through the idea of dirt
being swept away;mud
or clay; fig.
calamity:-
dirt, mire, clay].
What "miry clay" is here folks, is MUD!.
You know what mud is. We've all played with it when we we're kids and
let me tell you what God taught you. Mud is "runny",
"gooey", and down right "mucky". You've tried to
make something with it right? A "castle" or a "fort"
or anything else for that matter. What I means
is, that the "water" and the "dirt" don't mix!
The water keeps "separated" from the "dirt", and that's why you can't "form" anything with it!. Its "miry
clay",
not "clay"!
(I refer you again
to 2 Pet.2:17, Jude 12). Can we see some other confirmation of this?
"He
brought me up also out of an
horrible
pit,
out
of the
m
i r y c l a y,
and
set my feet upon a rock,
and
established my goings".
(Psalm
40:2)
This is the only
other use of this term in the bible. David wrote this Psalm, and what
was David's first claim to fame? He slew the "nephillim"
Goliath! (an Anakim). And to show he was not messing around, he
brought 4 extra "stones" for Goliath's 4 other "nephillim"
brothers. What's most interesting about the word "miry"
here is its
translation. Its different from the one in Daniel, Its [Strong's
ref. 3121 yaven,
yaw
- ven;
prop.dregs;
hence, mud:-
mire, miry.].
This translation is exclusive to this ONE
place in scripture.
As you can see, there is some substance to this.
"But
as the day's
of Noah were,so
S
H A L L A L S O
the
coming of the Son of man be".
(Matthew
24:37)
This warning should
not be taken lightly, for this comes out of the mouth of Christ!. You
must remember, the "day's" of Noah extended past the flood.
And we also found out that there was nephillim after the flood as
well. Noah lived up to the time of the advent of the first
"Antichrist", NIMROD.
This is an
important point to take note of, because the Antichrist to come will
be something "like" him. We shall continue further with our
study of this certain individual in part two of this series, as he
plays a most significant role in end time prophecy and is an
extremely important link between the "mysteries" of the
nephillim in the bible, and the modern day phenomena of UFO's,
aliens, and abduction historically.
The Antichrist plays one of the
most important roles in end-time bible prophecy. To understand the
connection between the modern day UFO, alien phenomena, and the
"nephillim" of the bible, one must know something of the
background and historical roots of the biblical Antichrist. After a
brief examination, we shall look further back in time for vestigial
traces between the "sons of God' interaction on mankind in
history, and the UFO phenomena of today in the scripture, and from
what we know from academia and science.
Lets take a look at a "key
figure" in end-time prophecy interpretation and his connections
with our topic in part 2 of this discussion.More can be shown
to directly connect the modern day UFO and alien dilemna with the
bible, by doing a simple study of the shadowy figure in the
scriptures known as the "Antichrist".
He, is ever so directly antiquated to "Lucifer" in the
scriptures, and shall play a most important role in the final episode
of the last days.
THE
CHIEF
The many different
aspects of the Antichrist as related in the bible, are hard to
understand unless you can SEE
the "system"
that ushers him in (NWO).
But given the
picture the bible gives us of him, only naivety would conclude that
this "man" is, well....like us! If their is one verse of
scripture to confirm this conclusion then:
"Yea,
the fir trees rejoice at thee, and the
cedars
of Lebanon, saying, Since
thou
(Antichrist)
art
laid
down,
no
feller
(nephillim)
is
come up against us".
(Isaiah
14:8)
This verse is a
prophecy pertaining to during the Tribulation in
co-ordination with verse 7 as well. This is the only place in the
entirety of scripture that uses this word "feller" in its
present form.. As I've shown before, "feller"
is used
"exclusively" of giants! (nephillim). But let's check out
the translation here. In the Hebrew its [Strong's
ref. 3772 karath,
kaw
- rath;
a prim. root; to cut
off;
by impl. to destroy
or consume;
spec. to make
a covenant (alliance
or bargain); be con-federate, feller,
lose, perish,
+utterly].
Doesn't the Antichrist "confirm" a "covenant" of
7 years? At the end , doesn't he "utterly lose" and
"perish"? Isn't he the one that "cut's off" the
"daily sacrifice", resulting in the "abomination of
desolation"? Isn't this talking about our boy? Than what's with
the absolutely non-sensical interpretation of the Church today?
The Antichrist is Satan's version of the
"Messiah". A half-god man! No its NOT
a deception, he's
REAL!.
The "deception" is to those who don't recognize him as
such, a REAL
LIVE MONSTER! His
"supernatural powers" will be completely REAL,
NOT MAGIC (no
rabbits and mirrors). THE
WHOLE WORLD WILL FOLLOW THIS "THING".
To the deceived he WILL
look like the
MESSIAH,
or shall I say to the vast majority, even the Lord
Jesus Christ! That's
how strong the "deception" is, to "deceive
even the very ELECT
if it were at
all possible",
and its happening RIGHT NOW (my people perish for lack of knowledge).
The bible shows that he will be the "king" of PHLANTHROPY,
the world will LOVE
HIM and
follow him right to hell.
In fact, the Church is primed for him RIGHT
NOW, and
they will FOLLOW
HIM with
the rest of THE
WORLD.
MILLIONS
OF CHRISTIANS ARE GOING TO PERISH!
As I've shown
earlier, the "ten kings" of Daniel are also nephillim, and
are in league with THE
BEAST and
his empire during the Tribulation. As I've shown earlier, there is a
direct connection between the fallen angels (watchers) and nephillim
(Zophim),
and "eyes". There is somebody
else antiquated
with "eyes" in scripture:
"...there
came up among them another
little
horn (Antichrist)...
and
behold, in this horn were
eyes
L
I K E
the
eyes of a man, and
a mouth speaking great things".
(Daniel
7:8)
