Fallen Watchers part two
God over-emphasizes
the fact that he had to DESTROY
"every living
thing" off the face of the earth (except Noah and family and
"carefully selected" animals). This is an extremely "stern"
action and has never really been properly understood as to why? Now
you KNOW
why, God HAD
to, otherwise no
life COULD
have been spared.
Left outside the hands of YHVH, man and beast would have been utterly
annihilated, by "nephillim infestation", and or by
themselves. This interaction also seemed to instill irrevocable
destruction to the "spiritual nature" of mankind, as
"...that every imagination of the thoughts
of his heart was
only EVIL CONTINUALLY"
(Gen.6:5).
There was only one way for YHVH to handle this dilemma, by "wiping
the proverbial slate clean!".
And that's exactly what the YHVH did....the flood. Satan had attempted to infiltrate ALL
FLESH LITERALLY,
to try and thwart
the inevitable birth of Yeshua/Jesus Christ. Had God not taken the stern
action of THE
FLOOD,
the doom of all mankind would have been a surety. The "plague"
of fallen angels completely and utterly perverted ALL
FLESH,
even the animal kingdom, as YHVH destroyed them as well. We may never
know the full extent of the ramifications dealing with the flood
event, but we do have somewhat of a "picture", if we will
believe the bible. Like most of the "deeper" truths in the
bible, they are not shown "openly" on the outside, but
rather "mixed throughout" the scripture. These truths are
only discernible when one digs deep into ALL
the Word, and pulls
these points together. There are things written in the bible, that NO
ONE HAS FOUND AS YET as
things have not occurred for the prophecy given to be revealed. God
has made his Word this way. Some things must come to pass for these
truths to come to the forefront, and so it is with the area of the
"nephillim" in the bible.
It has been the modern UFO era,
that has brought to light the truths revealed in Genesis 6, and also
confirming what Christ had said about the time of the end, and its
similarity to the time of the flood. As a matter of fact, the bible
says the end will be EXACTLY
like the time
before the flood. Though Satan failed the first time, he will, and is
attempting it once again for his TIME
IS SHORT.
The reality of this truth is and will be totally denied by the Church
at large, for it goes against THEIR
DOCTRINES AS TAUGHT BY MEN.
It does not matter, for the TRUTH
will always remain
THE
TRUTH, no
matter how much they try to deny it.
Now Noah and the seven
others of his family were "spared". What the Church will
teach you, is that Noah was "perfect". He was a "just"
man, and thereby by he was "superiorly righteous" before
the Lord. Nope, you have to dig deeper then that. The word perfect
here is translated
in the Hebrew [Strong's
ref. 8549 tamiym,
taw
- meem;
entire, without blemish,complete,
perfect,undefiled,whole].
It comes from an
even earlier root, tamam,
meaning be
clean, consume,and make
an end [Strong's ref. 8552]. Now, all these adjectives are
descriptive of "sacrifices" and used in this context.
Certain sacrifices or burnt offerings, had to be made with animals
that were "unblemished" or perfect "specimens"
(physically). These were considered "undefiled" and
acceptable offerings unto YHVH. Face it folks, we found out after
the flood that Noah wasn't at all that "perfect" now was he
(he was a drunk!). No, I'm pretty sure the Word of God is indicating
that Noah's "bloodline" was "undefiled" by the
fallen angel "invasion". His "genealogy" was
unaffected by the fallen ones, thereby allowing an untainted
bloodline to pass through the flood, which pass's on through to the
1st
advent of the
Savior.
Both the spiritual and the physical aspects of "pureness"
or "perfection" (unblemished, without spot) are
represented in the scripture. What has never been properly explained
is the "physical" aspect. The interpretation by the Church
leaves God looking like a "bumbling idiot" when it comes to
his "creation". No, there is something "deeper"
inferred by God in the LAWS of "cleanliness" and
"purification" as to what is interpreted commonly today.
God does not put just any old thing in his Word, and expect you to
uphold them. No, there is precise "meaning" and "purpose"
in every last JOT
AND TITTLE of
his Word.
The whole mystery of 'why the flood?' becomes clear when
one acknowledges the truth of Genesis ch.6. You will begin to
understand "why" the person of Noah, and his "purpose"
according to the flood event. You will understand why Noah was
"spotless" and without "blemish". This will not
seem at all too remarkable when one looks at the typology and
eschatology concerning Noah in comparison with Christ. There is a
hidden message in the genealogy from Adam to Noah. It is quite
remarkable in that it really sums up to be a prophecy concerning
Christ in the most simplest of ways you can think of. If we take the
names of Adams descendants up to Noah, and translate them from Hebrew
to English, we find this remarkable message of Yeshua Christ's
mission, for the redemption of all mankind, from the "curse"
exacted at the fall.
HEBREW
Adam
Seth
Enosh
Kenan
Mahalalel
Jared
Enoch
Methusalah
Lamech
Noah
|
ENGLISH
Man
appointed
mortal
sorrow;
the
blessed God shall
come down teaching
his death
shall bring the
despairing rest,
or comfort
|
"Man
(is) appointed mortal sorrow; (but) the blessed
God
shall come down teaching (that) his death shall
bring
(the) despairing rest."
This
truly is a "bible code" if there ever was or is such a
thing. NO WAY, that a group of Jewish Rabbi's would
deliberately contrive to hide an expression of the Christian Gospel
within their venerated Torah!. Indeed, this was by supernatural
design.
THE
SEED
Now, what on God's
green earth could possibly be the PURPOSE
of the fallen
angels "procreating" with mankind you ask? Didn't you read
your bible? You have to go back a couple of chapters in Genesis to
find yet another verse of scripture that has NEVER
been
properly interpreted or understood:
"And
I will put enmity between thee (Satan)
and
the woman, and between
thy
seed (Satan's)
and
her
seed (daughters of men);
it
(seed
of mankind, Yeshua/Jesus)
shall
bruise thy head (Satan's),
and
thou (Satan's
seed, Satan) shalt
bruise
his
(Yeshua/Jesus)
heel".
(Gen.
3:15)
This is nothing
other than a clear cut "declaration of war" and HOW
it will be fought,
and is initiated directly from God. What has completely been
overlooked, is this verse of scripture says that Satan has a SEED.
The use of the word "seed" here is being used in the
context of "children" or "offspring". Both uses
of the word "seed" here comes from the SAME
translation in the
Hebrew [Strong's
ref. 2233 zera,
zeh
- rah;
seed, fig. plant, sowing-time, posterity:-
x carnally,
child,
fruitful].
The use of this word here is in the context of "child bearing".
What this is revealing, is that the WAR
is being fought out
against the "seed of mankind" (or woman), by the SEED
OF THE SERPENT (nephillim).
You won't completely understand all this yet, but it will all become
"crystal clear" when I begin to discuss the ANTICHRIST,
later on. The other fallen angels that are with Satan are NOT
his "seed".
ONLY
the "nephillim"
are Satan's seed, even though the rest of the fallen angels are
submissive to his purposes and will. Only the seed of the nephillim
came through the carnal union of fallen angels and mankind, all other
beings of the angelic host were "created in heaven". This
verse of scripture ALONE,
indicates that there was (is?, going to be?) a definite interaction
on a "physical" scale, between mankind (woman) and
"non-human (but with corporeal bodies) supernatural entities".
The "target" of attack by the "seed of the serpent",
is the "seed of the woman" that Jesus would come from. It
is directed and focused at Jesus's "bloodline", even though
the seed of mankind is targeted as well (spoken generally). Satan
tried to directly "defile" the bloodline from which Messiah
would come from before the flood, and it will be shown that he did
after,
has been still,
and is going to eventually come out with his "secret weapon".
The enmity against mankind in general will culminate with the advent
of Antichrist (Satan's
"special" seed). But lets now SEE
if this is so. Was
Satan put out of the business of "hybridization" by the
flood?, or is he still doing it?
AFTER
By
the time Abram (not yet Abraham) was pursuing his "kidnapped"
brother Lot into Danite country, king Chedorlaomer of ancient Elam,
was "slaughtering" TRIBES
of these nephillim
all over the land (Gen.14:5). This is before the eventual "erasure"
of Sodom and Gomorrah. This has always stumped theologians. How did
these things show up after the flood? And how could they "multiply"
so rapidly into what seems to be "races" when studying the
text?. There are various Hebrew myths that claim that king "Og"
of Bashan (a nephillim), was descended from another nephillim called
"Hiya", who was the son of the fallen angel called
"Shemyaza" (a watcher.
See book of Enoch). "Og" was said to have "escaped the
Deluge by clinging to a rope

ladder
attached to the Ark, and being fed by Noah through a pothole"
according to myth. The initial nephillim "infestation", was
completely erased by the flood. ALL
flesh perished. The
"physical" structures (bodies) of these entities were
destroyed . This was NOT
their final end.
These initial nephillim were transformed from their "nephillim"
form, into their newest incarnation, DEMONS!
(disembodied
nephillim). A large number of these demon remnants of the nephillim
from the flood, are NOW
being held in
tartarus (hell.
To be released in the future), while the rest are confined to the
earth. To show that this is true, one only has to look where the word
"demon" comes from.
The word "demon",
which is exclusive
to the Greek, was translated from the words "seirim"
and "shedim",
in the Hebrew. "Seirim",
is the name of a "tribe" of nephillim, which are related to
have been native to the area of Mt. Seir, south of the Dead Sea. The
name comes from the Hebrew [Strong's
ref. 8165 Seiyr,
say
- eer;
seir, a mountain of Idumaea and its aboriginal
occupants.].
But the root for this word is the most revealing[Strongs
ref. 8163 saiyr,
saw
- eer;
shaggy,
a he-goat; by anal. a faun:-
devil,
goat, hairy, satyr.].
And even more [Strong's
ref. 8175 saar,
saw
- ar;
a prim. root, to storm,
i.e. fear:- be horribly afraid, be tempestuous,
come like a storm.].
It is the root
"saiyr",
that we get the Greek translation for"daemon"
(demon). The scary
thing about these root words for the name "Seirim", is they
all indicate that these things were REAL
TANGIBLE CREATURES.
They were "aboriginal occupants", they were "hairy"
and "shaggy", they are related to being "fauns"
(fairies), "satyrs" (may I point your attention to the
"myth" of the Greek god Pan), and DEVILS,
but they were tangible, PHYSICAL
manifestations that
lived and were "native" to some areas. The word "shedim"
in the Hebrew means [Strong's
ref. 7700 shed,
shade;
a demon:-
devil.].
This comes from an earlier, and quite interesting
[Strong's ref.
7736 shuwd,
shood;
a prim. root; to swell
up,
fig. (by impl. of insolence),to
devastate:-
waste.].
It was the
combination of these two Hebrew words, that we get our version,
demons. The "shedim" are the most ancient of all nephillim
tribes listed in the bible. The source of the root is said to predate
the ancient chaldean it comes from. Along with the "seirim",
these two tribes were pre-flood. Their historical traces are found
only in vestigial remnants of ancient Hebrew and chaldean legends,
and in the Hebrew language itself. Their REALITY
is confirmed by the
Holy Writ.
In the above illustration, I have placed the
name"Beth-Rapha"as
a possible connection to the appearance of the nephillim after the
flood. The reason why, is that this families name means literally
"house
of the dead" or
"house
of the Rapha" (demon).
It must be completely are NOT
nephillim, and
nephillim are NOT
demons
and so on. The term "demon" is generic, just as "angel"
is generic. Nephilim
are "demonic", but not demons. What we are dealing with
here, is the HIERARCHY
of the ENEMY.
This is referred to by the apostle Paul in the New Testament as the
"kosmokrateros". Demons have their own subset hierarchy as
will be shown. It is important that you understand this fact.
The
Church by and large, doesn't have a clue as to how Satan's hierarchy
works, and as such, "my
people perish for lack of knowledge".
This diagram is by no means comprehensive, but it shows that there is
a "pattern of succession" that occurs from angel, to fallen
angel, to nephillim, down to demon. It shows HOW
the host of heaven
(evil alignment) became structured trough a system of "de-generation"
(they fall
from one "stage",
to the next, each time relinquishing
some their abilities and power).
It would seem that this is the price that is payed by the fallen
angels for their tampering with the flesh. The difference between a
fallen angel and a demon, is that the fallen angel has the ability
and power to "manifest and de-manifest flesh", and more
than likely still retains most of his powers and abilities from his
"first habitation". The fallen angel is more or less "held
at bay as to what he is allowed to do", A demon on the other
hand, does NOT
have these
abilities anymore. They have lost the ability to "manifest
flesh", and have lost also their once "corporeal body"
(nephillim). They need to "possess" a body now, that is not
their own. Now is a good time to refer to the ex-canonical book of
Enoch, which WAS
apart of the
original canon of scripture at one time, placed just before the book
of Job:
Now
the nephillim, who have been
born
of spirit and of flesh,
shall
be called upon earth
evil
spirits,
and
on earth shall be their habitation. Evil spirits shall
proceed
from their flesh,
because
they were created from above;
from
the holy (?) Watcherswas
their beginning
and
primary foundation...."
(Enoch
15)
As you can see,
this text indicates that the demons are directly descended from the
nephillim, and that the nephillim are descended from the fallen
angels (watchers). Demons have traversed three consecutive stages to
end up where they now are. In so doing, they have lost most of their
abilities to "penetrate" into the physical like they once
had the ability to do. It can be shown, that not all demons share the
same abilities. There are "types"
of demons that are
distinctly different in how they operate, and in some instances,
described as having different properties in the way they manifest and
interact in the physical.
"...The
spirits of the nephillim shall be like
c
l o u d s,
which
shall oppress, corrupt, fall, contend, and
bruise
those upon the earth...".
(Enoch
15)
The adjective
"clouds", is most descriptive (2 Pet.2:17, Jude 12). The
relationship between "bruise those upon the earth" and Gen.
3:15 is most evident. All of the titles designated to angels can be
either "good" or "fallen", with the exception of
the Archangels (even though Satan could have possibly been an
Archangel, the bible is silent on this). All angels according to the
bible, were either cherubim
or seraphim.
There are no other "types"
given. Satan IS
a
Cherub! That is how he was created. His NATURE
has changed, but not too much else (in form). Its only wise to assume
that all "fallen" angels must be of these two types as
well, only their "alignment" has changed. Their "structure"
(cherub or seraph), did not change when they fell. Their "angelic
powers" were NOT
changed as well.
They are just limited now as to what they are ALLOWED
to do.
The
misconception that when they "left there first habitation",
they lost their angelic abilities is absurd. This stems from the
perception, that fallen angels are demons. They are NOT!.
Demons are directly connected to the nephillim in the scriptures.
Their "first habitation" was HEAVEN,
now they are confined to HERE
(this universe,
especially earth). Demons no longer have access to heaven, and
furthermore, scripture seems to indicate that demons can NOT
FLY! (Matt.12:43,
Luke 11:24). The word used in both of those passages in the New
Testament, specifically means "walking". Its very important
that you understand this, demons are on the "bottom of the
totem-pole" . They do not have the same "benefits" so
to speak, as they once had.
End of part two